INN 2.6.4 util/inndf test 6 gives different result on ppc64le on Fedora
Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski
dominik at greysector.net
Tue Feb 16 22:06:42 UTC 2021
On Tuesday, 16 February 2021 at 22:16, Julien ÉLIE wrote:
> Hi Dominik,
> > That works without making the patch conditional on ppc64le arch, thanks!
> As for the INN 2.6.4 Fedora package, I think you can drop
> inn-2.6.4-pie.patch because it is now enforced by default for the whole
> build. I've checked in the Fedora build logs, that it is OK:
> checking if gcc supports -fPIE... yes
> checking if gcc supports -pie for linking... yes
> Every program built has that flag, and both rnews and innd have it twice :)
I'll drop it.
> Description of the inn package needs being reviewed:
The description was written by previous maintainers. I'll update it
according to your suggestions.
> inn-devel package:
> I've looked at the installed files. These two ones for INN Perl modules
> should not be in inn-devel but in inn directly:
I'll move them, thanks.
> Also, maybe clibrary.h and config.h should not be in inn-devel but in inn.
I'll move those as well.
> inn package:
> A few files ending with ".in" are mentioned in /usr/share/doc/inn/samples as
> installed files; they should be excluded.
Thanks for the thorough review!
Fedora https://getfedora.org | RPM Fusion http://rpmfusion.org
There should be a science of discontent. People need hard times and
oppression to develop psychic muscles.
-- from "Collected Sayings of Muad'Dib" by the Princess Irulan
More information about the inn-workers